This idea sprang off of #1348 where two Drupal contrib modules were suggested as a possible solution to the issue reported. These modules are Content Access and Simple Access (Taxonomy Access Control has also been mentioned). @biolithic has started a port of Content Access in https://github.com/biolithic/content_access and @Graham-72 ported Simple Access in https://github.com/backdrop-contrib/simple_access
It's worth mentioning as a reference https://github.com/backdrop-ops/contrib/issues/105 too.
In #1348 there was this idea also for what could be implemented in core:
From a brief look at the features of these two modules, I have to say that Simple Access seems more ...well "simple" and useful to me. But that might be because I have specific use-cases in mind that happen to match its features and its "mechanics" (I like the approach of leaving the rest of the content accessible by everyone instead of the other way around). [...]
From their UI screenshots available on d.org, I have to say that they seem a bit "too much" for core inclusion, but I still would like to see something like that offered by core. Perhaps a simplified version (UI-wise) could be put together. I was thinking something along the following lines perhaps: 1. A flag that simplifies the distinction of "private" (more fine-grained access control) vs "public" (access content permission) nodes. 2. A per-content type setting that provides the following options: 1. no privacy flag feature at all (the default for all content types). 2. allow specific nodes of that type to be set as "private" (give authors an option). 3. make it so that all nodes of that type are set to "private" (no option given to node author). 3. A set of permissions for allowing users to edit node privacy (allow edit all/own privacy flags). 4. A second set of permissions to allow specific role(s) to view all "private" nodes (in essence a permission to override this feature altogether - intended for admins). 5. A per-node "make this page/article private" checkbox (available to users with the respective permission from 3 above - provided to nodes of type that are set to option 2ii from above). 6. Setting the private flag, would limit viewing only to the node author + users with the override permission from 4 above. 7. A bulk operation available to make nodes private en masse (credits for the idea to @Graham-72). 8. Contrib modules could extend this feature further. For example allow private nodes to be viewed by all users that have the same role(s) as the author (e.g allow some simplified version of group privacy) or OG integration (when ported).
Thoughts?
Recent comments
On D7 project we are using openid_connect. We need to have similar functionality for Backdrop CMS, sooner rather than later.
OpenID?
Why not insert the script using a custom block at the very top of the page? Who said that it won't work correctly if you don't place it in the <head>? Especially when the question...
Google tag and event snippet on the conversion page
You can use https://statichost.host for hassle free static experience.
Generate a Static Site