Cloning and tweaking instead of having to start from scratch is much easier for people.
This may be a step towards solving some of the UX issues discussed in #1519 too. Site admins seem to be using the "Full HTML" format as a go-to solution when content editors demand more. This is OK in general, but it creates false expectations that people will get a WYSIWYG etc.
If we provided an easy way for admins to clone the "Filtered HTML" format, then they would do that, and add buttons + allow additional HTML tags as required (which is what they should be doing).
Recent comments
Hi Editing I see this: The CSS looks like this: /* Level 1: Standard Numbers */ .field-name-body ol { list-style-type: decimal; } /* Level 2: Lowercase Letters */ .field...
Numbered List format is different when editing
Done: https://github.com/backdrop/backdrop-issues/issues/7097 Feel free to edit it with better technical language. I'll have ago at vaccinating it but I'm only a user and the...
Numbered List format is different when editing
Hi Mike. That looks like a bug. The CKE ordered lists when editing have the correct CSS to format those lists correctly, but when Backdrop displays the body field in Basis, it doesn't...
Numbered List format is different when editing