Description of the need
In https://github.com/backdrop/backdrop-issues/issues/5170 We described how Backdrop allows field configs to exist without a corresponding field data table. A consequence of this situation is also discovered in https://github.com/backdrop/backdrop-issues/issues/3224#issuecomment-903... where if we attempt to save an entity with an attached field and instance, we get an exception.
Proposed solution
This new function would allow Backdrop to check if any storage method described in a field has been set up for that field. Currently in core, we only have field_sql_storage as a method
Alternatives that have been considered
We could also attempt to create storage automatically upon trying to save any attached field, in addition to this check
Recent comments
If there is time, carried over from last week as we didn't have time to look at it then, I would welcome feedback on the approach I've taken to: [A11Y] Update aria role on...
July 16th, 2026 - Weekly Meetings
If there's some time left after discussing code signing (yay!)... 1. Friendly reminder: usage stats are still broken Didn't data get fetched at all (broken parser) or is it a display...
July 16th, 2026 - Weekly Meetings
Sorry - it is the field_group module. However, last night I switched off proxying to the site and proved to Cloudflare Support that it was NOT a Backdrop issue. After a thorough...
Cloudflare specific advice needed [SOLVED]