This is the respective issue for https://www.drupal.org/project/drupal/issues/474684 (change record), and part of the #5317 meta-issue.
Parsing .info files for dependency information is already implemented on the modules administration page. Adding support for the same dependencies in theme.info files, and implementing the same behavior on the
admin/appearancepage, would allow designers building heavily customized themes to make safer assumptions about their target sites.A theme might require the existence of imagecache to auto-generate variations of a header image. This would be a nice compromise between systems like Wordpress and Joomla!, which give themes much greater control over the functionality of the site, and Drupal's module-centric approach.
Proposed solution
- Allow themes to add the dependencies to .info files
- Show these dependencies on
admin/appearance, and make it impossible to install without the requirements via UI or command line- Make it possible to install dependent modules and layout templates when installing a theme (either manually, or via the Project Browser/Installer)
- Validation is added to prevent installing themes that depend on uninstalled modules, and prevent uninstalling modules that are depended upon by installed themes. This is implemented at a level that prevents these installs/uninstalls from occurring programatically or via cli (Drush/Drupal Console).
User interface changes
- Themes listed in
admin/appearancewill list the modules/layouts they depend on and the ability to install/enable that theme will not be available unless those module/layout dependencies are met.- The module descriptions found at
admin/modulesandadmin/module/uninstallwill include themes in their "Required by" description.API changes
Themes will be able to define modules dependencies in their info.yml via the dependencies key.
Recent comments
Ruby Text can be a bit of a hassle to edit... Yes, I can imagine that. No idea, how an editor dialog (or whatever) for easier editing of those should look like - in terms of...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5
"why are these tags only relevant for admins?" I'm allowing the editor as well. That being said, Ruby Text can be a bit of a hassle to edit... easy to accidentally delete a tag or part of a...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5
Out of curiosity: why are these tags only relevant for admins? Don't "regular" editors on that site also need them under circumstances? Yes, the editors play nicely, no problem to...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5