This is basically the same as https://www.drupal.org/project/ideas/issues/607396 (and related to the older https://www.drupal.org/project/ideas/issues/501366)
Problem/Motivation In most Drupal projects, the need comes up for a collection of fields. This is normally achieved with a light-weight entity such as Paragraphs or Field collection.
In Drupal 8 the go to solution for this is the Paragraphs module, which over time was also expanded to control content-type display, so that content editors could effectively control layouts with it.
Now Drupal core has a stable layout builder, the need to use it for layouts is no more, but there is still a need to use it for compound fields. This however doesn't integrate as well with layout builder, because there is a disconnect between content-editing and layout building.
In addition, in core we have a use case for such a compound field in the ingredients field on the Umami recipe content type. At present it is implemented as a text-field, which prevents us from using Drupal's modelling tools to build powerful features such as a view listing 'all recipes featuring chocolate'. This is because the ingredients field is used to list three distinct items. E.g.
1 cup of flourWhen really this should be three fields
1 (quantity) cup (unit) of flour (ingredient)If we had a way to build compound fields from the UI in core, we could construct a new field-type for the ingredients list comprising the following sub-fields
- Quantity - number
- Unit - text-list or taxonomy term
- Ingredient - taxonomy term
This would unlock Drupal's relationship modelling power.
Proposed resolution Add a compound field type to core with a proposed target of being an experimental module in Drupal 9.1
The field will provide a UI to allow site-builders to build new field-types by combining existing field types.
All other functionality should continue to work.
- Views support
- formatter support
- widget support
- data storage and retrieval
- serializer support (JSON API etc)
- translation support
- revision support
Remaining tasks Work has commenced in both the Field union (PreviousNext) and rich field (Lullabot) projects to investigate how feasible this is.
The two have agreed to join-forces and work towards a common goal
We have a slack channel #multifield
Recent comments
Ruby Text can be a bit of a hassle to edit... Yes, I can imagine that. No idea, how an editor dialog (or whatever) for easier editing of those should look like - in terms of...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5
"why are these tags only relevant for admins?" I'm allowing the editor as well. That being said, Ruby Text can be a bit of a hassle to edit... easy to accidentally delete a tag or part of a...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5
Out of curiosity: why are these tags only relevant for admins? Don't "regular" editors on that site also need them under circumstances? Yes, the editors play nicely, no problem to...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5