When looking at the results of a views query, I see something like this:
SELECT node.nid AS nid, node.title AS node_title, node.type AS node_type, users_node.name AS users_node_name, users_node.uid AS users_node_uid, node.status AS node_status, node.changed AS node_changed
FROM
{node} node
LEFT JOIN {users} users_node ON node.uid = users_node.uid
WHERE (( (node.status = 1 OR (node.uid = 1 AND 1 <> 0 AND 1 = 1) OR 1 = 1 OR 1 = 1 OR (node.type = 'book' AND 1 = 1) OR (node.type = 'core' AND 1 = 1) OR (node.type = 'core_release' AND 1 = 1) OR (node.type = 'docs' AND 1 = 1) OR (node.type = 'page' AND 1 = 1) OR (node.type = 'post' AND 1 = 1) OR (node.type = 'project_layout' AND 1 = 1) OR (node.type = 'project_module' AND 1 = 1) OR (node.type = 'project_release' AND 1 = 1) OR (node.type = 'project_theme' AND 1 = 1) OR (node.type = 'quote' AND 1 = 1) OR (node.type = 'sa' AND 1 = 1) OR (node.type = 'supporter' AND 1 = 1)) ))
ORDER BY node_changed DESC
LIMIT 50 OFFSET 0
But it would be much easier to read with line breaks and indentation, like this
SELECT
node.nid AS nid,
node.title AS node_title,
node.type AS node_type,
users_node.name AS users_node_name,
users_node.uid AS users_node_uid,
node.status AS node_status,
node.changed AS node_changed
FROM
{node} node
LEFT JOIN {users} users_node
ON node.uid = users_node.uid
WHERE (((
node.status = 1 OR
(node.uid = 1 AND 1 <> 0 AND 1 = 1) OR
1 = 1 OR
1 = 1 OR
(node.type = 'book' AND 1 = 1) OR
(node.type = 'core' AND 1 = 1) OR
(node.type = 'core_release' AND 1 = 1) OR
(node.type = 'docs' AND 1 = 1) OR
(node.type = 'page' AND 1 = 1) OR
(node.type = 'post' AND 1 = 1) OR
(node.type = 'project_layout' AND 1 = 1) OR
(node.type = 'project_module' AND 1 = 1) OR
(node.type = 'project_release' AND 1 = 1) OR
(node.type = 'project_theme' AND 1 = 1) OR
(node.type = 'quote' AND 1 = 1) OR
(node.type = 'sa' AND 1 = 1) OR
(node.type = 'supporter' AND 1 = 1)
)))
ORDER BY node_changed DESC
LIMIT 50 OFFSET 0
GitHub Issue #:
1590
Recent comments
BTW, this is still a problem in the D7 version (despite what that issue said), so I'm not sure this is possible. I'll have to look more closely into it.
How to order a view by its aggregated value
Hmm... I was able to reproduce this issue when I thought it would work. Wuold you mind opening an issue in the queue?
How to order a view by its aggregated value
Hi Robert. I'm looking at D7 issues about this - apparently this is possible since 10 years ago, which means the functionality is there, but there may be some issues with the way your view is...
How to order a view by its aggregated value