Trigger was removed from core for D8 without providing a worthy alternative other than Rules (which by many is considered a "cumbersome piece of code with a confusing UI"). Having in mind our goals to be providing as much backwards compatibility as possible and easier transition from D7 to Backdrop, should we consider bringing trigger.module back in Backdrop core ...or at least putting it in contrib as a "lightweight" alternative to Rules (which is not fully ported yet and might take time to do so)?
For the record, here's a summary of the reasons for it's removal from D8 core (from the respective issue in the d.org issue queue: Remove Trigger module from core [#764558]):
The actions API is wonky (look up your action via hash of function name?), actions/trigger has no maintainer in MAINTAINERS.txt and we have not seen the promised conversion of things like node operations into actions.
Also, the trigger UI is weak, and there's not a lot you can do with it.
In general, people use a contrib module like Rules - so let's just put this code back in contrib where it belongs and reduce some of the bloat in core.
Recent comments
The inability to check for and install updates makes website development and maintenance extremely difficult. Managing over ten websites across two different hosting providers—one of which is...
Unable to run update - fails with Connection timed out
Thanks for the response, Herb! Since I posted that I did some more testing and have posted this issue https://github.com/backdrop-contrib/tfa_basic/issues/33 In fact, if both email...
TFA - how to setup fallback options 'per user'
I'll test this tomorrow to see if I can replicate the problem and report back. It's not "per user" so it should be working.
TFA - how to setup fallback options 'per user'