Description of the need
As https://www.drupal.org/node/3276042 says Drupal has deprecated the Color module in 9.4.0 and will remove it from the core in 10.0.0. Has Backdrop community considered to do the same, because some of the arguments described on https://www.drupal.org/project/ideas/issues/2808151 feels true for also Backdrop:
We should move Color module to a contributed project since as it stands, it doesn't provide enough flexibility to be useful for the majority of sites. To be able to create website matching to corporate identity, you would probably want to change at least background images and font families as well.
We never use the Color module on any Backdrop projects as well as number of other modules in core, but I guess it would be too radical to request to move them too from core. But just in case if this resonates to someone else in the community I wonder how many of Backdrop developers really use the following modules? Should they be in core or could be better off as contributed modules?
See the whole list of core modules on https://github.com/backdrop/backdrop/tree/1.x/core/modules:
book - nice module, but rarely used. is core right place for it? ckeditor - too heavy, too slow, an overkill for some of the simple websites.
Recent comments
Ruby Text can be a bit of a hassle to edit... Yes, I can imagine that. No idea, how an editor dialog (or whatever) for easier editing of those should look like - in terms of...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5
"why are these tags only relevant for admins?" I'm allowing the editor as well. That being said, Ruby Text can be a bit of a hassle to edit... easy to accidentally delete a tag or part of a...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5
Out of curiosity: why are these tags only relevant for admins? Don't "regular" editors on that site also need them under circumstances? Yes, the editors play nicely, no problem to...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5