Description of the bug (not sure if this can be considered a bug).
entity_access() currently ignores checking for access to operations view, update and delete if no entity is provided.
There are situations when one may invoke, for example, entity_access('view', 'node'); to check if a user can view any content (Rules does this). So, instead of ignoring (and returning null), the function should actually check for that access. The issue is that, since there is no entity, we have not way to invoke $node->access().
In D7, Entity API included a access callback key/value pair in hook_entity_info() which allowed someone to specify the access callback, which could be invoked without the need of having an actual entity object handy. That would solve this situation.
AFAIK, because of this, Backdrop currently has not abstracted way to check access to entities when there is no entity available, other than directly checking the permission doing user_access(). This creates problems for modules that deal with many types of entities in abstract ways, like Entity Reference and Rules.
I'm really at a loss on how to solve this issue - or even if it's necessary to solve it. I guess one way to deal with this is by modifying projects like Rules to granularly check for user permissions.
Any feedback or thoughts will be appreciated. I'm trying to get Rules to deal in a sensible way with access checks.
Recent comments
@yorkshirepudding, In the end I fixed it by deleting the config/active folder contents, copying the config/staging/ files into config/active, importing the database again and clearing the caches...
Importing the staged config throws an error: another field with the same name already exists
Thanks, I have to go out now, I will try later on and report back
Importing the staged config throws an error: another field with the same name already exists
Hi Francis. Yes, what config do you have in staging for it? You might have configs like: field.field.field_video_embed field.instance.node.page....
Importing the staged config throws an error: another field with the same name already exists