Once #49 gets in, what stopping us from using entity translation instead of content translation
Pros: unified way of handling translation (nodes, taxonomy, ...) no need of i18n
Cons: still hard to manage translations of menu, block and other things
Related - https://github.com/backdrop/backdrop-issues/issues/4198 Content translation improvements
As people weigh in here with reasons they prefer (or were forced) to use entity translation, I would love if it we could add those reasons to that issue too -- since many of those improvements will be able to be included before 2025 :)
Recent comments
Trying to push it to upstream 🤞 https://github.com/drush-ops/drush/pull/6621
Using Drush 8 with php 8
Wow, thank you!
Using Drush 8 with php 8
Hi folks, I went ahead and ported all drush 8.x stuff to PHP 8.3 and completely ripped out the legacy Symfony 2 internals. You can check out the exact details of what was done in the PR...
Using Drush 8 with php 8