This is a follow-up to #3402, specifically for the user roles form.
@klonos
I do not think that a separate "required" column provides any value. This status will never be removed for the anonymous and authenticated roles, and it will never be assigned to any of the other roles. I would much better prefer that we had a pseudo-description column in its place ("pseudo" because we do not actually provide any means for descriptions to be added to roles), explaining why these two roles are special and can't be removed.
Here's what I had in mind:

On mobile, it would look like this:

PS: The more/less toggle makes this part of #5090.
Recent comments
Ruby Text can be a bit of a hassle to edit... Yes, I can imagine that. No idea, how an editor dialog (or whatever) for easier editing of those should look like - in terms of...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5
"why are these tags only relevant for admins?" I'm allowing the editor as well. That being said, Ruby Text can be a bit of a hassle to edit... easy to accidentally delete a tag or part of a...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5
Out of curiosity: why are these tags only relevant for admins? Don't "regular" editors on that site also need them under circumstances? Yes, the editors play nicely, no problem to...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5