This is related to #1040.
I'm wondering if the UX would be better if instead of this:
- fill form in a rush, but fail to notice the tiny red asterisks in some fields
- click "save"
- page reloads
- see validation errors
- fix errors
- click save again
...we provided a better UI that guided people to this: 1. fill form in a rush, but still fill in required fields because "required" indicators are bigger and made more prominent -> get a "live" feedback/indication that you've done the right thing 2. save -> win! (at least less chances that you've done something "wrong")
Something like this:

Here's another set of screenshots to demonstrate do's and don't's with regards to accessibility:
Recent comments
Ruby Text can be a bit of a hassle to edit... Yes, I can imagine that. No idea, how an editor dialog (or whatever) for easier editing of those should look like - in terms of...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5
"why are these tags only relevant for admins?" I'm allowing the editor as well. That being said, Ruby Text can be a bit of a hassle to edit... easy to accidentally delete a tag or part of a...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5
Out of curiosity: why are these tags only relevant for admins? Don't "regular" editors on that site also need them under circumstances? Yes, the editors play nicely, no problem to...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5