Follow-up to #1077...
It would be great if the respective fields for node_nid, user_uid, file_fid and taxonomy_term_tid would be able to do auto-complete search and offer pretty entity names to pick from instead of the numeric fields we are currently providing:
(form elements in the screenshot above edited for visibility)
We should also replace those "cryptic" names in the drop-down menu with pretty names too like "Content: Title", "User: Username" and "Taxonomy term: Name".
The value saved in config would still be the entity ID, we'd only show a "pretty", human-focused autocomplete to the end user, with available options to select from.
PS: while at it, also replace "Node: Type" with "Content: Type" in the spirit of not exposing the term "node" in the UI.
Recent comments
Out of curiosity: why are these tags only relevant for admins? Don't "regular" editors on that site also need them under circumstances? Yes, the editors play nicely, no problem to...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5
Worked like a charm! Exactly what I envisioned... now I can edit the ruby text right in the editor, sweet:) Thank you! For those who may have a similar issue, try TinyMCE, create a new "text...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5
Yes, you can use TinyMCE on some content and CKEditor5 in others. There is no problem having both enabled on a system.
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5