It looks like it has a dependency on Gmap which doesn't appear to be ported yet, so it's a multi-step port. I think @stpaultim's suggestion to post a port request in the queue is a good place to start.
I'm really hoping to make this simple change on new content types: https://github.com/backdrop/backdrop-issues/issues/7080
Let's disable the "Display author and date information" by...
For our DEV meeting:
an older bug needs (and could have) a fix.
Issue #5729 - Views: Search Filter: On Empty Input "Show None" option Shows All
There are 2 pull requests, but one...
Ruby Text can be a bit of a hassle to edit...
Yes, I can imagine that. No idea, how an editor dialog (or whatever) for easier editing of those should look like - in terms of...
"why are these tags only relevant for admins?" I'm allowing the editor as well. That being said, Ruby Text can be a bit of a hassle to edit... easy to accidentally delete a tag or part of a...
Out of curiosity: why are these tags only relevant for admins?
Don't "regular" editors on that site also need them under circumstances?
Yes, the editors play nicely, no problem to...
Comments
Have you tried it in Backdrop? It looks quite simple and may just work.
It has been suggested in this discussion, https://forum.backdropcms.org/forum-topic/where-make-request-drupal-modu... that you might post a module port request here:
https://github.com/backdrop-ops/contrib/issues (tag it "port request").
There are no guarantees, but I have seen items posted here get ported.
It looks like it has a dependency on Gmap which doesn't appear to be ported yet, so it's a multi-step port. I think @stpaultim's suggestion to post a port request in the queue is a good place to start.