Nine pull requests are currently marked RTBC - time to consider merging? Bug fixes mostly, and not too complex.
Issue #6987: There's a PoC PR for the "text field Tribbles" problem.
Issue #1528: Another rabbit hole with additional layout paths, it seems. But overall the new approach works pretty well. (Some feedback would be nice.)
Two issues would benefit from testing and code reviews; they've been around for a while and no takers. It would be a shame for these to miss the next releases.
PR improves it significantly but is not a perfect 100% fix at all zoom levels. However, we should not let the desire for perfection prevent incremental improvement.
If anyone has a suggestion to get it to 100%, I'm all ears.
No code reviews or testing yet. I have included a View definition in the issue that requires no additional test data (it is a view of modules) so it can be easily tested in the sandbox.
Hi Kevin
I am interested assisting you developing a theme by cloning feature from existing WordPress website.
Please let me know your suitable time to discuss further...
Posted6 days 19 hours ago by Deep Vyas (deepvyas) on:
I've updated the Zulip link in both places I found it. No need to post again, unless you have something new to say. We'll pull together feedback from all the sources.
Should we post here again, what we posted over there? Or would that unnecessarily duplicate things?
The link to a Zulip thread in this initial post leads to an internal one, but there's...
This is a really good idea. I nearly always search on GitHub if I'm not sure of the name.
That said, there is still room for improvement in GitHub as many repos have a useless description...
Posted1 week 2 days ago by Martin Price | System Horizons Ltd (yorkshirepudding) on:
Comments
For the dev meeting: Progress all over the place.
Nine pull requests are currently marked RTBC - time to consider merging? Bug fixes mostly, and not too complex.
Issue #6987: There's a PoC PR for the "text field Tribbles" problem.
Issue #1528: Another rabbit hole with additional layout paths, it seems. But overall the new approach works pretty well. (Some feedback would be nice.)
Two issues would benefit from testing and code reviews; they've been around for a while and no takers. It would be a shame for these to miss the next releases.
There are some test failures in the user module after merging in the latest commits.
Randomly, only in one PHP version - and always a different one.
See also this Zulip thread, yorkshirepudding.
Perhaps, these latest lines of random test failures can be considered in the meeting too?