May I know if backdrop vulnerable to the Log4shell/Log4j (CVE-2021-44228) in any stage or version or third party plugin found vulnerable to this ? Is there any official statement from backdrop on this ? I need a firm answer on this. Thanks.
Backdrop is definitely not vulnerable because of Log4j. Log4j is a Java component; Backdrop doesn't directly use Java, it's written in PHP, HTML, and JavaScript, with a smattering of scripting languages and configurations.
Note: I don't speak officially for Backdrop, but I'm pretty confident about this.
Correct, if you add multiple condition statements they are treated as AND so it would appear to the system as:
node/103 AND node/91 which will never happen.
Glad you found the way to...
Posted3 hours 35 min ago by Martin Price | System Horizons Ltd (yorkshirepudding) on:
YES! That works.
This whole thing is extremely bizarre, though. On the site I'm building (not the sandbox demo), I had a view that was displaying multiple images correctly (i.e. once, not...
Maybe "Query settings" : "Distinct".
If there are multiple identical items, each will be displayed only once. You can use this to try and remove duplicates from a view, though it...
Excellent! Yes, that's one of those "too simple and obvious" solutions. I hadn't thought of it either.
However, this solves only one part of the problem (empty blocks). It doesn't solve my...
Comments
Backdrop is definitely not vulnerable because of Log4j. Log4j is a Java component; Backdrop doesn't directly use Java, it's written in PHP, HTML, and JavaScript, with a smattering of scripting languages and configurations.
Note: I don't speak officially for Backdrop, but I'm pretty confident about this.
I'm glad to hear this. Thanks for your affirmation.