We are asking folks to help us conduct a simple usability test on our community infrastructure:
How to help:
If you have not had the opportunity to evaluable a working copy of Backdrop CMS in the last 12 months:
- DO NOT read the comments here until you finished the test.
- Attempt to accomplish the following scenario
- Post a comment below with feedback about how easy or difficult it was to accomplish this task and any ideas you have for making it easier.
Scenario:
You would like access to a sandbox site to evaluate Backdrop CMS to see what features it comes with 'out of the box" without having to install it yourself.
Recent comments
I'm really hoping to make this simple change on new content types: https://github.com/backdrop/backdrop-issues/issues/7080 Let's disable the "Display author and date information" by...
February 26th, 2026 - Weekly Meetings
For our DEV meeting: an older bug needs (and could have) a fix. Issue #5729 - Views: Search Filter: On Empty Input "Show None" option Shows All There are 2 pull requests, but one...
February 26th, 2026 - Weekly Meetings
Ruby Text can be a bit of a hassle to edit... Yes, I can imagine that. No idea, how an editor dialog (or whatever) for easier editing of those should look like - in terms of...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5
"why are these tags only relevant for admins?" I'm allowing the editor as well. That being said, Ruby Text can be a bit of a hassle to edit... easy to accidentally delete a tag or part of a...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5
Out of curiosity: why are these tags only relevant for admins? Don't "regular" editors on that site also need them under circumstances? Yes, the editors play nicely, no problem to...
Specific tags to work in CKEditor 5