I'm having difficulty with a particular View of a content type, where the lower-privileged staff user can access and edit the draft content if given the URL directly, but when dealing with a View that collates all of those that are Draft, the staff member cannot see the list. As though there are extra perms being set in the View than is what is in the rest of the system. The View's perms are "Administer Content", I have also tried setting to Role, and choosing the appropriate roles, without any difference.
The staff member can access the view , but one of the exposed filters is the Published:Yes/No. If published=Yes, they get the table. Published=No they get the Zero Results global text.


Agreed about the size of the json files. Will tidy it up when I have it all working. So many views...
So I am hoping, and from tests so far can see that it is fine, that the Team members don't have access beyond what Views would normally give them.
Found it by doing a diff against the working managers.
Bypass node access. Set TRUE for the team allows the views to work properly. Which suggests that Views has a different way of checking access perms from the regular node access, as these nodes were viewable/editable directly.