So far, I don't think there has ever been a deprecated, officially unsupported project (module or theme...).
But it's also unclear, what the steps are to achieve that. It's even unclear, if that's possible at all. Very likely help from someone with sufficient permissions on backdropcms.org is necessary.
I think, the approach - or to start with, the policy - should get documented somewhere.
1.4k contrib projects exist on GitHub, and people start to find broken, outdated, unmaintained, obsolete ones, which still show up in the installer. It doesn't seem ideal to leave all those zombies in an installable state (via Project Browser), because that means, site admins have to decide whether somethings safe to install, while they don't see the whole picture (last commit ages ago, open issue with warnings, might break the site worst case...).
The bug squad is a great idea, but not the solution for completely abandoned projects.
As PHP and Backdrop core move on, problems with those "zombies" will increase. At least, that's what I assume.
This may be somewhat difficult to address for various reasons.
Some projects may look abandoned to someone new looking at it and yet may show a number of installs. The number of installs may not indicate it is actually being used, or it may indicate use on old sites that are still present and becoming unmaintained themselves.
So what is the goal:
Alert new users that the project is unmaintained, dwindling in support, not necessarily a good choice, needs a new maintainer.
Alert existing sites where the module may be installed that it has become stale and they should review their use of it.
Marking projects as deprecated and work towards removing them.
The primary goal is clarity: what happens / has to happen if... ;-)
Currently, for example, I couldn't even deprecate my own projects, they will still show up in all project installers. And there's nothing I could do about it.
The other thing is: what happens with projects that are definitely unmaintained, and nobody wants to take over, and the project's already known to break sites only by installing (an extreme example, of course, but that can and will happen at some point, as PHP moves on).
Is it even (technically) possible to prevent such a rotten tomato from showing up in the installer? Be it, because a maintainer wants it, or because it's clear, that tomato will never get fresh again, as several attempts to fix the problems failed (example: a module that depends on a 3rd party service that has passed away).
There are probably several situations, where a defined way to sunset a project - clearly documented - is beneficial. Currently I don't think, there is a way.
Thank you for providing the links to the Ckeditor 5 problem when using the gin theme that may occur after updating Backdrop to the 1.32.0 release, and the link to the new release of gin that...
Here is a possibly related issue in the core issue queue:
After upgrade from 1.31.1 to 1.32.0 update.php shows fatal errors and leaves site in maintenance mode
https://github.com/...
It sounds like a CSS/JS bug in the Layouts UI: when the "Add block" row is hidden with display:none, its help/description element isn’t being hidden together.
🔧 Things to try...
Thank you, Martin and Olaf! I had a feeling that there might be something out there already :)
I will check all three options (I will look at porting modules) and report back which one...
Comments
How to deal with abandoned projects?
So far, I don't think there has ever been a deprecated, officially unsupported project (module or theme...).
But it's also unclear, what the steps are to achieve that. It's even unclear, if that's possible at all. Very likely help from someone with sufficient permissions on backdropcms.org is necessary.
I think, the approach - or to start with, the policy - should get documented somewhere.
1.4k contrib projects exist on GitHub, and people start to find broken, outdated, unmaintained, obsolete ones, which still show up in the installer. It doesn't seem ideal to leave all those zombies in an installable state (via Project Browser), because that means, site admins have to decide whether somethings safe to install, while they don't see the whole picture (last commit ages ago, open issue with warnings, might break the site worst case...).
The bug squad is a great idea, but not the solution for completely abandoned projects.
As PHP and Backdrop core move on, problems with those "zombies" will increase. At least, that's what I assume.
This may be somewhat difficult to address for various reasons.
Some projects may look abandoned to someone new looking at it and yet may show a number of installs. The number of installs may not indicate it is actually being used, or it may indicate use on old sites that are still present and becoming unmaintained themselves.
So what is the goal:
There may be more goals.
The primary goal is clarity: what happens / has to happen if... ;-)
Currently, for example, I couldn't even deprecate my own projects, they will still show up in all project installers. And there's nothing I could do about it.
The other thing is: what happens with projects that are definitely unmaintained, and nobody wants to take over, and the project's already known to break sites only by installing (an extreme example, of course, but that can and will happen at some point, as PHP moves on).
Is it even (technically) possible to prevent such a rotten tomato from showing up in the installer? Be it, because a maintainer wants it, or because it's clear, that tomato will never get fresh again, as several attempts to fix the problems failed (example: a module that depends on a 3rd party service that has passed away).
There are probably several situations, where a defined way to sunset a project - clearly documented - is beneficial. Currently I don't think, there is a way.